XRES.L vs. XDER.L
XRES.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and XDER.L (Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C) are both REIT funds - XRES.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index while XDER.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRES.L returned 6.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for XDER.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRES.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for XDER.L.
Performance
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRES.L is traded in USD, while XDER.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDER.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRES.L achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than XDER.L's -2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XRES.L has outperformed XDER.L with an annualized return of 6.39%, while XDER.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.05% annualized return.
XRES.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
XDER.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- -1.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -5.51%
- 10Y*
- 0.05%
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRES.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 9.04% | 3.99% | 2.44% | 12.71% | -25.97% | 46.91% | -3.45% | 27.10% | -2.96% | 10.89% |
XDER.L Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C | -2.03% | 19.56% | -9.52% | 19.36% | -40.09% | 9.39% | -3.10% | 27.00% | -12.35% | 27.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRES.L and XDER.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between XRES.L and XDER.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRES.L
XDER.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
XRES.L
XDER.L
Basic Materials
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Communication Services
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
Consumer Defensive
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Energy
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Financial Services
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
Healthcare
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Industrials
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Technology
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Utilities
XRES.L
-
XDER.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRES.L vs. XDER.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRES.L
XDER.L
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) and Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRES.L | XDER.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.00 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.07 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | -0.18 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRES.L | XDER.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | -0.07 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.23 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.00 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.23 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRES.L drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum XDER.L drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRES.L and XDER.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRES.L | XDER.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -55.61% | +17.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -18.00% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.95% | -23.51% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.70% | -55.61% | +20.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.84% | -55.61% | +17.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -29.13% | +25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -15.57% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 7.24% | -4.37% |
Volatility
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) is 4.47%, while Xtrackers FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe Real Estate UCITS ETF 1C (XDER.L) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that XRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDER.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRES.L | XDER.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 6.37% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 14.39% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 17.56% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 24.13% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 21.77% | -2.88% |
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XDER.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRES.L vs. XDER.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRES.L nor XDER.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRES.L and XDER.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XDER.L.
XRES.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index, while XDER.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XRES.L and 0.33% for XDER.L.
Find the right allocation for XRES.L and XDER.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer