XRES.L vs. AREG.L
XRES.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) and AREG.L (abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds. XRES.L is passively managed, while AREG.L is actively managed. Over the past year, XRES.L returned 9.37% vs 7.92% for AREG.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRES.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for AREG.L.
Performance
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRES.L is traded in USD, while AREG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AREG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRES.L achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than AREG.L's 4.70% return.
XRES.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
AREG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 7.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XRES.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 9.04% | 3.99% | 10.72% |
AREG.L abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF | 4.70% | 8.05% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRES.L and AREG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XRES.L and AREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRES.L vs. AREG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRES.L
AREG.L
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) and abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRES.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 0.71 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 2.44 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRES.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.64 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.57 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRES.L drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than AREG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRES.L and AREG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRES.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -20.06% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -11.08% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -5.48% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -5.36% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 3.24% | -0.37% |
Volatility
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to abrdn Future Real Estate UCITS ETF (AREG.L) at 3.78%. This indicates that XRES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRES.L | AREG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.78% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 9.63% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 12.25% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 13.96% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 13.96% | +4.93% |
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AREG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRES.L vs. AREG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRES.L nor AREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRES.L and AREG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AREG.L.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XRES.L and 0.40% for AREG.L.
Find the right allocation for XRES.L and AREG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer