XREP.L vs. HPRD.L
XREP.L (Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - XREP.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index while HPRD.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XREP.L returned 6.73%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for HPRD.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XREP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.
Performance
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XREP.L is traded in GBp, while HPRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HPRD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XREP.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than HPRD.L's 7.03% return.
XREP.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 10.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPRD.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 13.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 9.29% | -3.09% | 4.07% | 6.60% | 1.33% |
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 7.03% | 2.99% | 1.56% | 5.34% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XREP.L and HPRD.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XREP.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XREP.L
HPRD.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
XREP.L
HPRD.L
Basic Materials
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Communication Services
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
Consumer Defensive
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Energy
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Financial Services
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
Healthcare
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Industrials
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Technology
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
Utilities
XREP.L
-
HPRD.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
XREP.L
HPRD.L
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XREP.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.50 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 5.04 | -4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XREP.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.08 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.40 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XREP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.50%, smaller than the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -34.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XREP.L and HPRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XREP.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -34.92% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.50% | -8.62% | -20.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.50% | -17.00% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.53% | -3.31% | -18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -9.19% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.76% | 2.58% | +17.18% |
Volatility
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP (XREP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that XREP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XREP.L | HPRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.49% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 9.58% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.28% | 12.02% | +32.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 15.03% | +12.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 16.23% | +11.20% |
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XREP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XREP.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison
XREP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF | 3.06% | 3.17% | 3.39% | 3.35% | 3.53% | 2.30% | 2.88% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 2.89% | 3.13% | 2.72% |
XREP.L Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XREP.L and HPRD.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XREP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XREP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for HPRD.L.
XREP.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index, while HPRD.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XREP.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.
Find the right allocation for XREP.L and HPRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer