PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XRE.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. XRE.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRE.TO returned 4.82%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for XGRO.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.

Performance

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRE.TO achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XRE.TO has underperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 4.82%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.

XRE.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
0.50%
YTD
10.05%
6M
12.65%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
4.82%

XGRO.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
5.00%
YTD
10.70%
6M
8.71%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRE.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF		10.05%8.89%-2.52%1.88%-17.34%32.49%-13.63%21.91%5.66%9.27%
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		10.70%15.59%19.53%15.01%-11.08%14.29%11.51%17.97%-6.73%11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XRE.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007

0.40

The correlation between XRE.TO and XGRO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XRE.TO
XGRO.TO

Real Estate

100.0%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

5.6%

Communication Services

-

6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.8%

Energy

-

7.2%

Financial Services

-

20.3%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

7.3%

Technology

-

25.8%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Real Estate

XRE.TO
100.0%
XGRO.TO
0.4%

Basic Materials

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
5.6%

Communication Services

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
3.8%

Energy

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
7.2%

Financial Services

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
20.3%

Healthcare

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
5.1%

Industrials

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
7.3%

Technology

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
25.8%

Utilities

XRE.TO

-

XGRO.TO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF

iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio

Often compared with XRE.TO:
XRE.TO vs. ZRE.TOXRE.TO vs. VRE.TOXRE.TO vs. CGR.TOXRE.TO vs. XIC.TOXRE.TO vs. XDIV.TOXRE.TO vs. XBB.TOXRE.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with XGRO.TO:
XGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. VEQT.TOXGRO.TO vs. XCG.TOXGRO.TO vs. TGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOXGRO.TO vs. XAW.TO

Return for Risk

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XRE.TO
XRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO
XGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XRE.TOXGRO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
2.22

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.62
3.13

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.36

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

14.92

-10.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the XGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRE.TO and XGRO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XRE.TOXGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.22

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.99

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.83

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.36

+0.13

Drawdowns

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than XGRO.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRE.TO and XGRO.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XRE.TOXGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.06%

-47.97%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-7.12%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-12.47%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.53%

-18.40%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.58%

-25.85%

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

0.00%

-3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-8.49%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.60%

+1.40%

Volatility

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XRE.TOXGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.40%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

9.20%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

10.78%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

11.05%

+5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

12.26%

+5.31%

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRE.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.75% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XGRO.TO
iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio		1.75%1.92%1.98%2.22%1.86%1.66%1.94%2.21%7.42%2.04%2.65%2.15%
XRE.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF		4.47%5.00%5.55%4.52%4.85%2.59%4.45%4.82%4.80%4.71%5.20%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

XRE.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XRE.TO.

XRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XRE.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRE.TO and XGRO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer