XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO).
XRE.TO and CGR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRE.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD. It was launched on Oct 17, 2002. CGR.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM REIT NR CAD. It was launched on Aug 26, 2008. Both XRE.TO and CGR.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XRE.TO or CGR.TO.
Key characteristics
| XRE.TO | CGR.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.36% | 12.81% |
| 1Y Return | 11.64% | 21.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.73% | 0.39% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.57% | 2.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.16% | 5.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.98 | 2.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.56 | 2.95 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.64 | 1.20 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.17 | 10.80 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.12% | 2.44% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.60% | 12.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.06% | -52.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.47% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRE.TO and CGR.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XRE.TO achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly lower than CGR.TO's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XRE.TO has underperformed CGR.TO with an annualized return of 4.16%, while CGR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than CGR.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) and iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Dividend Comparison
XRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than CGR.TO's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRE.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF | 4.82% | 4.52% | 4.85% | 2.59% | 4.45% | 4.82% | 4.80% | 4.71% | 5.20% | 5.59% | 4.93% | 4.93% |
CGR.TO iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF | 2.40% | 2.59% | 2.40% | 1.70% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.54% | 4.25% | 2.83% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 1.82% |
Drawdowns
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.06%, which is greater than CGR.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRE.TO and CGR.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XRE.TO vs. CGR.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to iShares Global Real Estate Index ETF (CGR.TO) at 4.07%. This indicates that XRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.