XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE
XQUA.DE (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D) and EMIE.DE (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - XQUA.DE tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while EMIE.DE tracks the JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XQUA.DE returned 0.43%/yr vs -2.28%/yr for EMIE.DE. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XQUA.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for EMIE.DE.
Performance
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQUA.DE achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than EMIE.DE's -0.43% return.
XQUA.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 1.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
EMIE.DE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQUA.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 1.67% | -1.83% | 4.80% | 3.61% | -12.81% | 6.04% | -3.38% | 3.31% |
EMIE.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.43% | 7.05% | -0.36% | 3.88% | -19.72% | -2.93% | 6.95% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQUA.DE and EMIE.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XQUA.DE and EMIE.DE has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XQUA.DE
EMIE.DE
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQUA.DE | EMIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.12 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.54 | 3.63 | -0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQUA.DE | EMIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.07 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.34 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.11 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum EMIE.DE drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.DE and EMIE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQUA.DE | EMIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -26.98% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -3.53% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.44% | -6.97% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -25.83% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -14.02% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | -12.69% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.09% | +0.40% |
Volatility
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) is 1.13%, while UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that XQUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQUA.DE | EMIE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 1.28% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.85% | 2.83% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.82% | 3.73% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 6.67% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.85% | 7.95% | +0.90% |
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQUA.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIE.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQUA.DE vs. EMIE.DE - Dividend Comparison
XQUA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while EMIE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIE.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQUA.DE Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 3.90% | 4.38% | 4.01% | 4.02% | 6.75% | 3.16% | 4.33% | 3.72% | 2.50% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQUA.DE and EMIE.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIE.DE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUA.DE.
XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while EMIE.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XQUA.DE and 0.43% for EMIE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XQUA.DE and EMIE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer