PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUA.DE achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FESD.DE's 3.41% return.


XQUA.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
1.89%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.37%

FESD.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.35%
YTD
3.41%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
1.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
1.67%-1.83%4.80%3.61%-12.81%6.88%
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
3.41%0.21%8.73%4.67%-13.30%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XQUA.DE and FESD.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.77

The correlation between XQUA.DE and FESD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUA.DE
XQUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FESD.DE
FESD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) and Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUA.DEFESD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.46

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

6.56

-3.02

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the FESD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUA.DE and FESD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUA.DEFESD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.40

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.22

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.19

-0.03

Drawdowns

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, which is greater than FESD.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUA.DE and FESD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUA.DEFESD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-16.01%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-3.71%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.44%

-12.34%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.68%

-16.01%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-0.59%

-8.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-7.16%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.39%

+0.10%

Volatility

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.DE) is 1.13%, while Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (FESD.DE) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that XQUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQUA.DEFESD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

2.28%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

4.57%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

6.51%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.31%

8.80%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.85%

8.70%

+0.15%

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XQUA.DE and FESD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

XQUA.DE vs. FESD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XQUA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than FESD.DE's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FESD.DE
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
6.69%5.90%5.86%5.43%4.80%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XQUA.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D
3.90%4.38%4.01%4.02%6.75%3.16%4.33%3.72%2.50%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQUA.DE and FESD.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQUA.DE and FESD.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

XQUA.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while FESD.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Fidelity.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQUA.DE and FESD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer