PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIE.DE achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBF.DE's -0.46% return.


EMIE.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
2.17%
5Y*
-2.35%
10Y*

4UBF.DE

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIE.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBF.DE's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIE.DE
EMIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBF.DE
4UBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMIE.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.72

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

1.03

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

0.88

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.65

3.74

-1.09

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the 4UBF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIE.DE and 4UBF.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMIE.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.72

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

-0.09

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between EMIE.DE and 4UBF.DE is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIE.DE nor 4UBF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, which is greater than 4UBF.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIE.DE and 4UBF.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIE.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-19.99%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-2.88%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.98%

-3.96%

-11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-8.71%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.68%

+0.29%

Volatility

EMIE.DE vs. 4UBF.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) is 1.49%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) Acc (4UBF.DE) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that EMIE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMIE.DE4UBF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.72%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.56%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

3.35%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.67%

5.02%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

5.02%

+3.00%