XQQI vs. QTEC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XQQI is actively managed, while QTEC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QTEC.

Performance

XQQI vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XQQI

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTEC

• 1D: -4.69%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 38.99%
• 6M: 36.41%
• 1Y: 56.32%
• 3Y*: 31.13%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 22.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.80%
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	34.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and QTEC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.91

Return for Risk

XQQI vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTEC

QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 66
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQI vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XQQI	QTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.53	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.11	—

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and QTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQI	QTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-58.86%	+45.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	-4.69%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-9.87%	+6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XQQI	QTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.52%	26.15%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.52%	29.72%	-3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	27.75%	-1.23%

XQQI vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQI vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, while QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.14%	0.15%	0.02%	0.44%	0.68%	0.91%	0.80%	1.29%	0.99%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XQQI and QTEC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XQQI and QTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XQQI or QTEC?

On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XQQI or QTEC?

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XQQI or QTEC?

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.

What is the main difference between XQQI and QTEC?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.57% for QTEC.