XQQI vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XQQI is actively managed, while QQQM is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

XQQI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XQQI

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.80%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	14.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and QQQM is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

XQQI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XQQI	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.97	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.58	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.94	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.88	—

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQI	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-35.04%	+21.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	-4.24%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-8.20%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XQQI	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.52%	17.85%	+8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.52%	22.53%	+3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	22.30%	+4.22%

XQQI vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQI vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XQQI and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, XQQI and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XQQI or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XQQI or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XQQI or QQQM?

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between XQQI and QQQM?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.15% for QQQM.