XQQI vs. QDVO

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by NEOS, while QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.

Performance

XQQI vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XQQI

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 7.03%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.56%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and QDVO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

XQQI vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 65
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQI vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XQQI	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.28	—

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQI	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-17.75%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.21%	-3.44%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-2.39%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XQQI	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.34%	12.67%	+12.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.34%	17.58%	+7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.34%	17.58%	+7.76%

XQQI vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQI vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than QDVO's 10.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.39%	9.92%	2.79%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.26%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XQQI and QDVO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XQQI and QDVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XQQI or QDVO?

On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XQQI or QDVO?

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XQQI or QDVO?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.39%, compared with 8.26% for XQQI.

What is the main difference between XQQI and QDVO?

XQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.56% for QDVO.