XQQI vs. QBUF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QBUF (Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XQQI is actively managed, while QBUF is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBUF.

Performance

XQQI vs. QBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XQQI

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBUF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. QBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.80%
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQI and QBUF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

XQQI vs. QBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QBUF

QBUF Risk / Return Rank: 83
QBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQI vs. QBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XQQI	QBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.26	—

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. QBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, which is greater than QBUF's maximum drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and QBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQI	QBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	-8.84%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	0.00%	-5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	-0.80%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XQQI	QBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.52%	5.25%	+21.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.52%	8.35%	+18.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	8.35%	+18.17%

XQQI vs. QBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QBUF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQI vs. QBUF - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, while QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XQQI and QBUF in my portfolio?

XQQI and QBUF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XQQI or QBUF?

On fees, QBUF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XQQI or QBUF?

QBUF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XQQI or QBUF?

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.00% for QBUF.

What is the main difference between XQQI and QBUF?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.79% for QBUF.