XQQI vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by NEOS, while IPDP is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Innovative Portfolios. Both are actively managed. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

XQQI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XQQI

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	16.92%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

XQQI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

XQQI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XQQI	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.55%	0.00%	-13.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	0.00%	-5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.95%	0.00%	-2.95%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XQQI	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.52%	0.00%	+26.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.52%	0.00%	+26.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.52%	0.00%	+26.52%

XQQI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

XQQI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	8.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XQQI or IPDP?

On fees, XQQI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XQQI or IPDP?

XQQI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XQQI or IPDP?

XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 8.24%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between XQQI and IPDP?

XQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IPDP is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 1.52% for IPDP.