PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQLT.TO vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT.TO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XQLT.TO is traded in CAD, while DGRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQLT.TO achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 10.45% return.


XQLT.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
3.86%
YTD
9.58%
6M
8.72%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
14.58%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.14%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XQLT.TO
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF
9.58%7.09%32.36%28.08%-17.15%27.90%11.61%9.78%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
10.45%10.41%26.49%7.84%-2.07%26.58%6.90%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XQLT.TO and DGRO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.47

The correlation between XQLT.TO and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XQLT.TO
DGRO

Technology

37.0%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
21.2%

Communication Services

11.0%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
16.4%

Industrials

7.9%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.5%

Energy

4.0%
5.6%

Utilities

1.8%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.5%

Technology

XQLT.TO
37.0%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

XQLT.TO
11.8%
DGRO
21.2%

Communication Services

XQLT.TO
11.0%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XQLT.TO
9.3%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

XQLT.TO
8.8%
DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

XQLT.TO
7.9%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

XQLT.TO
4.9%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

XQLT.TO
4.0%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

XQLT.TO
1.8%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

XQLT.TO
1.8%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

XQLT.TO
1.7%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQLT.TO
XQLT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XQLT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQLT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQLT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XQLT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQLT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT.TO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQLT.TODGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.97

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

14.69

-4.92

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQLT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQLT.TO and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQLT.TODGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.36

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.92

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.84

+0.09

Drawdowns

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQLT.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.12%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -29.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQLT.TO and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQLT.TODGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.12%

-29.39%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-6.16%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-15.15%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-16.54%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.70%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-3.06%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.66%

+0.54%

Volatility

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF (XQLT.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.57%. This indicates that XQLT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQLT.TODGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.57%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

7.87%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

10.38%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

15.06%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

17.75%

-1.30%

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQLT.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQLT.TO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

XQLT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
XQLT.TO
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor Index ETF
0.64%0.69%0.72%0.94%1.21%0.87%1.11%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQLT.TO and DGRO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for XQLT.TO.

XQLT.TO tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for XQLT.TO and 0.08% for DGRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQLT.TO and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer