PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -27.17% return, which is significantly lower than SVR-C.TO's -14.98% return.


XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.06%
YTD
-27.17%
6M
-27.17%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
17.87%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*

SVR-C.TO

1D
1.91%
1M
-20.11%
YTD
-14.98%
6M
-20.47%
1Y
69.24%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
17.95%
10Y*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-27.17%114.44%-3.35%-8.94%16.19%-1.94%9.31%
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)
-14.98%115.09%28.36%-3.27%9.55%-6.48%49.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.37

Over the past year, XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPPT.DESVR-C.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

1.43

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

3.15

-2.06

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, smaller than the maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown of -59.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.DESVR-C.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.25%

-59.99%

+17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.25%

-48.52%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.25%

-48.52%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.25%

-48.52%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.25%

-46.88%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-32.43%

+17.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.91%

22.06%

-2.15%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) is 10.55%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a volatility of 14.61%. This indicates that XPPT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.DESVR-C.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

14.61%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.26%

55.01%

-15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.81%

57.56%

-7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.91%

35.74%

-3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.28%

31.73%

+0.55%

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.DE nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and SVR-C.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer