XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE
XPPT.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPPT.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum, while ESGP.DE is a Gold fund tracking the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XPPT.DE returned 17.87%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for ESGP.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPPT.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -27.17% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.DE's 6.96% return.
XPPT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -16.06%
- YTD
- -27.17%
- 6M
- -27.17%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -27.17% | 114.44% | -3.35% | -8.94% | 16.19% | 2.07% |
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 6.96% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.DE
ESGP.DE
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPPT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.02 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 5.76 | -4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.25%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.25% | -20.50% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.25% | -6.31% | -35.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.25% | -20.50% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.25% | -2.49% | -39.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -5.27% | -9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.91% | 2.21% | +17.70% |
Volatility
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 3.55%. This indicates that XPPT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | 3.55% | +7.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.26% | 8.98% | +30.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.81% | 11.54% | +38.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 14.48% | +17.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 14.48% | +17.80% |
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPPT.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPPT.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while ESGP.DE is Gold. XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer