PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPPT.DE vs. BGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while BGLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BGLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -26.54% return, which is significantly lower than BGLD's -1.63% return.


XPPT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.57%
YTD
-26.54%
6M
-26.47%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*

BGLD

1D
0.45%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-4.01%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
-26.54%114.44%-3.35%-8.94%16.19%-7.36%
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
-1.63%17.24%29.84%9.84%3.62%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between XPPT.DE and BGLD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE
XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BGLD
BGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPPT.DEBGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.17

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

1.01

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

2.67

-1.53

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the BGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPPT.DE and BGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.74%, which is greater than BGLD's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and BGLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPPT.DEBGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.74%

-10.28%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.74%

-10.28%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.74%

-10.28%

-31.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.74%

-10.28%

-31.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.74%

-9.46%

-32.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-2.58%

-12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.39%

3.88%

+15.51%

Volatility

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) at 3.94%. This indicates that XPPT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPPT.DEBGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

3.94%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.16%

10.23%

+29.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.09%

11.76%

+38.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

10.39%

+21.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.28%

10.19%

+22.09%

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison

XPPT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.57%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF
46.57%44.32%25.04%10.49%0.40%
XPPT.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPPT.DE and BGLD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.

XPPT.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while BGLD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.91% for BGLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and BGLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer