XPO vs. VRT
XPO (XPO Logistics, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — XPO in Integrated Freight & Logistics, VRT in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 5 years, XPO returned 35.18%/yr vs 62.98%/yr for VRT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XPO vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPO achieves a 65.30% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 85.57% return.
XPO
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 65.30%
- 6M
- 59.53%
- 1Y
- 89.63%
- 3Y*
- 66.70%
- 5Y*
- 35.18%
- 10Y*
- 36.48%
VRT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 85.57%
- 6M
- 61.97%
- 1Y
- 160.87%
- 3Y*
- 142.34%
- 5Y*
- 62.98%
- 10Y*
- —
XPO vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPO XPO Logistics, Inc. | 65.30% | 3.63% | 49.73% | 163.11% | -27.64% | 11.60% | 49.56% | 39.73% | -40.40% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 85.57% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPO and VRT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XPO and VRT has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
XPO:
$26.73B
VRT:
$117.86B
XPO:
$2.92
VRT:
$3.99
XPO:
76.98
VRT:
75.41
XPO:
2.89
VRT:
0.33
XPO:
3.23
VRT:
10.84
XPO:
14.44
VRT:
27.77
XPO:
$8.30B
VRT:
$10.84B
XPO:
$772.00M
VRT:
$3.92B
XPO:
$1.20B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPO vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
XPO
VRT
XPO vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.77 | 6.53 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 18.20 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.79 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.03 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.00 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
XPO vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPO drawdown since its inception was -82.85%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPO and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.85% | -71.24% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.63% | -24.78% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.19% | -61.28% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.17% | -71.24% | +18.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -20.11% | +18.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -16.22% | -14.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.56% | 8.89% | -2.33% |
Volatility
XPO vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is 9.87%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that XPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPO | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 16.60% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.81% | 45.55% | -13.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.47% | 58.11% | -14.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.90% | 61.81% | -14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.80% | 54.61% | -6.81% |
Dividends
XPO vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
XPO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
XPO XPO Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
XPO vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPO Logistics, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XPO vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
XPO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
XPO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
XPO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPO and VRT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.60%) compared to XPO (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPO dropped -82.85% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPO and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer