XPH vs. YCS
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - XPH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPH returned 5.26%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for YCS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
XPH vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 11.13% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 5.26%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
XPH
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 54.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.26%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
XPH vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 11.13% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.54% | 14.68% | 25.61% | -15.32% | 12.05% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.78% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and YCS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | 0.13 |
The correlation between XPH and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
YCS
XPH vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 3.79 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 11.86 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPH vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, roughly equal to the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -49.56% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -8.30% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -23.05% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -27.32% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -27.32% | -8.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -19.88% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 2.65% | +0.68% |
Volatility
XPH vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 2.22% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.59% | 12.19% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 16.96% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 21.10% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 18.96% | +3.16% |
XPH vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPH vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.69% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and YCS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.63% vs 5.26% for XPH. On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
XPH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 1.00% for YCS.
XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPH and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer