XPH vs. MDEV
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) and MDEV (First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XPH tracks the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index while MDEV tracks the Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XPH returned 13.07%/yr vs -2.86%/yr for MDEV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MDEV.
Performance
XPH vs. MDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than MDEV's -11.48% return.
XPH
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 37.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
MDEV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -11.48%
- 6M
- -12.29%
- 1Y
- -7.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPH vs. MDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.01% |
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | -11.48% | 2.00% | 1.79% | 7.55% | -28.59% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and MDEV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XPH and MDEV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XPH vs. MDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPH
MDEV
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XPH
MDEV
Basic Materials
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Communication Services
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Consumer Defensive
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Energy
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Financial Services
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Industrials
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Real Estate
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Technology
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Utilities
XPH
-
MDEV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. MDEV — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
MDEV
XPH vs. MDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPH | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | -0.44 | +2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | -0.53 | +3.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.94 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | -0.39 | +3.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | -0.98 | +12.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPH | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | -0.44 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | -0.32 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
XPH vs. MDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than MDEV's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and MDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -42.34% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -18.13% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -22.50% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -33.76% | +26.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -25.65% | +8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 7.22% | -3.87% |
Volatility
XPH vs. MDEV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF (MDEV) at 4.60%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | MDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.60% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 11.42% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.52% | 16.00% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 18.98% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 18.98% | +3.12% |
XPH vs. MDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MDEV's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPH vs. MDEV - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while MDEV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV First Trust Indxx Medical Devices ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and MDEV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to MDEV (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs MDEV's -42.34%.
On 3-year performance, XPH leads with 13.07% vs -2.86% for MDEV. On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XPH has performed better with a 13.07% return vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for MDEV.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for MDEV.
XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while MDEV tracks Indxx Global Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 0.70% for MDEV.
XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPH and MDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer