XPH vs. IHI
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XPH tracks the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index while IHI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XPH returned 5.22%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for IHI. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IHI.
Performance
XPH vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -17.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has underperformed IHI with an annualized return of 5.22%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.61% annualized return.
XPH
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 20.41%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 1Y
- 59.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
IHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- 6M
- -18.57%
- YTD
- -17.20%
- 1Y
- -15.43%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- -2.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
XPH vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 19.55% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.54% | 14.68% | 25.61% | -15.32% | 12.05% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -17.20% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and IHI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XPH and IHI has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XPH vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XPH
IHI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XPH
IHI
Basic Materials
XPH
-
IHI
-
Communication Services
XPH
-
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
XPH
-
IHI
-
Consumer Defensive
XPH
-
IHI
-
Energy
XPH
-
IHI
-
Financial Services
XPH
-
IHI
-
Industrials
XPH
-
IHI
Real Estate
XPH
-
IHI
-
Technology
XPH
-
IHI
Utilities
XPH
-
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
IHI
XPH vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.87 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | -0.59 | +5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.95 | -1.25 | +19.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XPH vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, roughly equal to the maximum IHI drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -49.65% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -26.11% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -26.64% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -33.12% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -33.25% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -21.82% | +17.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.17% | -8.39% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 12.34% | -9.00% |
Volatility
XPH vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) have volatilities of 7.24% and 7.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 7.03% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 14.56% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 18.25% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 19.23% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 19.86% | +2.24% |
XPH vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPH vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than IHI's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.47% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.50% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and IHI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to IHI (7.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, IHI leads with 8.61% vs 5.22% for XPH. On fees, XPH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IHI has been the lower-risk option at 7.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IHI has performed better with a 8.61% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IHI.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.47% for IHI.
XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XPH and 0.38% for IHI.
XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPH and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer