PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. BMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPH vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than BMY's 5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 5.45%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.07% annualized return.


XPH

1D
1.77%
1M
9.48%
YTD
13.09%
6M
12.03%
1Y
55.30%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
5.45%

BMY

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.61%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.58%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
-0.64%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
1.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPH vs. BMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
13.09%31.60%4.94%2.97%-9.83%-10.54%14.68%25.61%-15.32%12.05%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
5.24%0.11%15.81%-26.14%18.98%2.88%0.41%27.74%-12.90%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XPH and BMY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.53

The correlation between XPH and BMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. BMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
BMY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPH vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPHBMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.64

1.95

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

4.41

+12.22

XPH vs. BMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPH Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPH and BMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPH vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, smaller than the maximum BMY drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and BMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHBMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

-72.03%

+24.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-12.53%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-36.02%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

-47.67%

+16.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-47.67%

+11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.09%

+20.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-22.38%

+5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

5.51%

-2.18%

Volatility

XPH vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) is 6.27%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that XPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPHBMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

8.49%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

18.04%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

26.96%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

24.08%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

25.30%

-3.21%

Dividends

XPH vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than BMY's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
4.50%4.60%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.53%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPH and BMY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMY has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to XPH (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs BMY's -72.03%.

XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPH and BMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer