XPAY vs. PBP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XPAY (Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF) and PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XPAY is actively managed, while PBP is passively managed. Over the past year, XPAY returned 27.22% vs 18.32% for PBP. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPAY charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PBP.

Performance

XPAY vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 4.90% return.

XPAY

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 5.07%
• YTD: 10.83%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 18.32%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: 8.10%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	10.83%	16.78%	3.17%
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	4.90%	8.49%	6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and PBP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024	0.75

The correlation between XPAY and PBP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XPAY vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY

XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 67
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PBP

PBP Risk / Return Rank: 82
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPAY	PBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.68	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.86	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.60	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.52	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.50	18.66	-5.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPAY vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPAY	PBP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.68	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	0.35	+0.87

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum PBP drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and PBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPAY	PBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-43.43%	+25.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-5.22%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.17%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-6.69%	+4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	0.98%	+1.04%

Volatility

XPAY vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 0.93%. This indicates that XPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPAY	PBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	0.93%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	5.53%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	6.87%	+4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	11.86%	+4.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	13.66%	+3.04%

XPAY vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPAY vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.37%, more than PBP's 11.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	11.16%	11.12%	9.36%	3.35%	1.33%	6.21%	1.41%	5.04%	2.59%	10.86%	2.56%	6.19%
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF	20.37%	21.21%	3.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPAY and PBP in my portfolio?

XPAY and PBP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPAY or PBP?

XPAY has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to PBP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs PBP's -43.43%.

Which ETF is better, XPAY or PBP?

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 27.22% vs 18.32% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPAY or PBP?

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 27.22% return vs 18.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPAY or PBP?

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPAY or PBP?

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.37%, compared with 11.16% for PBP.

What is the main difference between XPAY and PBP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.29% for PBP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.