PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 15.96% return.


XPAY

1D
-0.68%
1M
5.07%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.69%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDW

1D
-4.20%
1M
9.65%
YTD
15.96%
6M
20.80%
1Y
56.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and NVDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.56

The correlation between XPAY and NVDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPAYNVDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

2.24

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

5.44

+8.06

XPAY vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the NVDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and NVDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPAYNVDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.39

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.52

-0.31

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-25.54%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-25.54%

+16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-10.65%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-8.19%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

10.49%

-8.47%

Volatility

XPAY vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 2.76%, while Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.04%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

15.04%

-12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

30.74%

-21.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

41.15%

-29.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

41.15%

-24.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

41.15%

-24.45%

XPAY vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.37%, less than NVDW's 58.16% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XPAY and NVDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to XPAY (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs NVDW's -25.54%.

On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 56.88% vs 27.22% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 56.88% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 20.37% for XPAY.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.99% for NVDW.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer