XPAY vs. NVDW
XPAY (Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XPAY returned 27.22% vs 56.88% for NVDW. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XPAY charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVDW.
Performance
XPAY vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than NVDW's 15.96% return.
XPAY
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- 9.65%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPAY vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | 10.83% | 15.30% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 15.96% | 40.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPAY and NVDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XPAY and NVDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPAY vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
XPAY
NVDW
XPAY vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPAY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.24 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.24 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.50 | 5.44 | +8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPAY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.39 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.52 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XPAY vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPAY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.20% | -25.54% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -25.54% | +16.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -10.65% | +9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -8.19% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 10.49% | -8.47% |
Volatility
XPAY vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 2.76%, while Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a volatility of 15.04%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPAY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 15.04% | -12.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 30.74% | -21.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 41.15% | -29.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 41.15% | -24.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 41.15% | -24.45% |
XPAY vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPAY vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.37%, less than NVDW's 58.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 58.16% | 38.94% | 0.00% |
XPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | 20.37% | 21.21% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPAY and NVDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to XPAY (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs NVDW's -25.54%.
On 1-year performance, NVDW leads with 56.88% vs 27.22% for XPAY. On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XPAY has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDW has performed better with a 56.88% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 58.16%, compared with 20.37% for XPAY.
Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.99% for NVDW.
XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPAY and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer