PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. EGGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XPAY vs. EGGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XPAY vs. EGGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
-4.78%16.78%-1.40%
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
-5.28%14.41%-1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly higher than EGGS's -5.28% return.


XPAY

1D
2.76%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EGGS

1D
1.66%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-12.99%
1Y
20.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XPAY vs. EGGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EGGS's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. EGGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EGGS
EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. EGGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPAYEGGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.87

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.10

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

2.74

+3.97

XPAY vs. EGGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the EGGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and EGGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPAYEGGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.87

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.21

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and EGGS is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XPAY vs. EGGS - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.11%, more than EGGS's 17.09% yield.


Drawdowns

XPAY vs. EGGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, roughly equal to the maximum EGGS drawdown of -18.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and EGGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYEGGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-18.52%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-18.17%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-15.29%

+8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-5.82%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

7.30%

-4.70%

Volatility

XPAY vs. EGGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) is 5.21%, while NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that XPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XPAYEGGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

7.20%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

16.77%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.04%

23.13%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.26%

23.31%

-6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

23.31%

-6.05%