XOP vs. IXC
XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry while IXC tracks the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XOP returned 2.97%/yr vs 8.83%/yr for IXC. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
XOP vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 26.71% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 23.35% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 2.97%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.
XOP
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- YTD
- 26.71%
- 1Y
- 21.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
XOP vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 26.71% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 23.35% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and IXC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.88 |
The correlation between XOP and IXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOP vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOP
IXC
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XOP
IXC
Basic Materials
XOP
IXC
-
Industrials
XOP
IXC
-
Communication Services
XOP
-
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOP
-
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
XOP
-
IXC
-
Financial Services
XOP
-
IXC
-
Healthcare
XOP
-
IXC
-
Real Estate
XOP
-
IXC
-
Technology
XOP
-
IXC
-
Utilities
XOP
-
IXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
IXC
XOP vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.95 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | 6.26 | -3.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOP vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -67.88% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.50% | -15.36% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.98% | -19.06% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | -24.93% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | -64.16% | -18.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.77% | -11.22% | -29.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.57% | -17.45% | -25.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 4.78% | +2.76% |
Volatility
XOP vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.59%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 6.59% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.07% | 15.86% | +6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.03% | 19.18% | +8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.73% | 23.45% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.17% | 26.81% | +13.36% |
XOP vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOP vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than IXC's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.08% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2.05% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOP and IXC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to IXC (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 8.83% vs 2.97% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 8.83% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.05% for XOP.
XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOP and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer