PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 36.08% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 3.80%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


XOP

1D
1.35%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
36.08%
6M
26.81%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
3.80%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
36.08%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and GLD is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.14

The correlation between XOP and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOP vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
GLD

Energy

97.2%

-

Basic Materials

2.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOP
97.2%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

XOP
2.9%
GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

XOP

-

GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

XOP

-

GLD

-

Industrials

XOP

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

XOP

-

GLD

-

Technology

XOP

-

GLD

-

Utilities

XOP

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOPGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.68

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

4.15

+2.95

XOP vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOPGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.21

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

1.01

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.83

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.60

-0.54

Drawdowns

XOP vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-45.56%

-44.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

-19.21%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-19.21%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-21.03%

-13.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-22.00%

-60.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.40%

-17.75%

-18.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.59%

-16.16%

-26.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

7.73%

-1.83%

Volatility

XOP vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

5.51%

+4.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.64%

23.16%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.81%

26.61%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

18.00%

+15.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.28%

15.95%

+24.33%

XOP vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOP vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.90%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOP and GLD have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 3.80% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while GLD is Gold. XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.40% for GLD.

XOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer