XOP vs. DRLL
XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry while DRLL tracks the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOP returned 14.10%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for DRLL. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
XOP vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 36.08% return, which is significantly higher than DRLL's 31.26% return.
XOP
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 41.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
DRLL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 31.26%
- 6M
- 27.14%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOP vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 36.08% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 5.27% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 31.26% | 7.74% | 0.02% | -1.84% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and DRLL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between XOP and DRLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOP vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOP
DRLL
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XOP
DRLL
Basic Materials
XOP
DRLL
-
Communication Services
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOP
-
DRLL
Consumer Defensive
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Financial Services
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Healthcare
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Industrials
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Real Estate
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Technology
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Utilities
XOP
-
DRLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
DRLL
XOP vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.11 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 8.82 | -1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.94 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.57 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
XOP vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -23.73% | -66.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -13.93% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.98% | -23.73% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.40% | -8.10% | -28.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.59% | -8.02% | -34.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.90% | 4.90% | +1.00% |
Volatility
XOP vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) at 9.15%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 9.15% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.64% | 18.04% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.81% | 22.34% | +5.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 23.76% | +10.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.28% | 23.76% | +16.52% |
XOP vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOP vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than DRLL's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.33% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.90% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XOP and DRLL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XOP has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to DRLL (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs DRLL's -23.73%.
On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 14.67% vs 14.10% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs 14.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.90% for XOP.
XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.41% for DRLL.
DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOP and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer