PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. UCG.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XOM is traded in USD, while UCG.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UCG.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than UCG.MI's 4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has underperformed UCG.MI with an annualized return of 9.64%, while UCG.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.03% annualized return.


XOM

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
23.81%
6M
25.40%
1Y
35.30%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
9.64%

UCG.MI

1D
3.99%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.26%
6M
9.65%
1Y
37.05%
3Y*
70.33%
5Y*
53.22%
10Y*
34.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
23.81%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
UCG.MI
UniCredit S.p.A.
4.26%119.11%59.43%101.17%-1.90%65.36%-35.50%31.65%-38.41%158.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and UCG.MI is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.27

The correlation between XOM and UCG.MI shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. UCG.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UCG.MI
UCG.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UCG.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCG.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCG.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UCG.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCG.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMUCG.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.30

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

3.61

+2.96

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the UCG.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and UCG.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum UCG.MI drawdown of -94.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and UCG.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMUCG.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-94.03%

+31.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-26.80%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-26.80%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-50.48%

+29.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-69.19%

+7.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.68%

-7.29%

-6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-68.09%

+57.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

9.62%

-3.78%

Volatility

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and UniCredit S.p.A. (UCG.MI) have volatilities of 9.08% and 8.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMUCG.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

8.74%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

26.62%

-6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

32.83%

-8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.77%

37.98%

-11.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

49.20%

-21.00%

Dividends

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than UCG.MI's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UCG.MI
UniCredit S.p.A.
4.30%4.10%7.08%4.02%4.05%0.89%0.00%2.07%3.24%0.00%0.88%0.47%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.78%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. UCG.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and UniCredit S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. XOM values in USD, UCG.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and UCG.MI have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and UCG.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer