PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XOM has outperformed T with an annualized return of 9.31%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


XOM

1D
0.68%
1M
7.66%
6M
15.76%
YTD
24.95%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
25.29%
10Y*
9.31%
ALL TIME*
11.57%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
24.95%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and T is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.33

The correlation between XOM and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XOM:

$614.94B

T:

$152.52B

EPS

XOM:

$5.96

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

XOM:

24.91

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

XOM:

1.16

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.93

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.92

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

-0.46

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

-1.03

+6.44

XOM vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, roughly equal to the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-64.15%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.11%

-28.89%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-28.89%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-32.01%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.01%

-42.35%

-18.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.89%

-21.57%

+8.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-15.74%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

12.94%

-5.14%

Volatility

XOM vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 7.32%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 9.59%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

9.59%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

19.91%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

23.72%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.68%

24.38%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

23.92%

+4.37%

Dividends

XOM vs. T - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.75%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
83.16B
33.47B
(XOM) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and T have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to XOM (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs T's -64.15%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer