PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOM vs. ENB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XOM vs. ENB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 26.26% return, which is significantly higher than ENB's 20.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XOM having a 9.82% annualized return and ENB not far behind at 9.33%.


XOM

1D
-1.39%
1M
4.40%
YTD
26.26%
6M
30.38%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
24.00%
10Y*
9.82%

ENB

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.41%
YTD
20.83%
6M
20.17%
1Y
27.79%
3Y*
21.89%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOM vs. ENB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
26.26%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
20.83%19.51%26.35%-1.13%6.46%30.83%-13.60%36.05%-15.53%-2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XOM and ENB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 1990

0.31

The correlation between XOM and ENB shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

XOM:

$5.93

ENB:

$4.92

PE Ratio

XOM:

25.29

ENB:

11.44

PEG Ratio

XOM:

1.17

ENB:

0.52

PS Ratio

XOM:

1.96

ENB:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

XOM:

$326.01B

ENB:

$69.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XOM:

$83.11B

ENB:

$15.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

XOM:

$60.44B

ENB:

$17.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOM vs. ENB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ENB
ENB Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOM vs. ENB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMENBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.96

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

7.46

+1.89

XOM vs. ENB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the ENB Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOM and ENB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMENBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.67

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.38

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.53

-0.05

Drawdowns

XOM vs. ENB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than ENB's maximum drawdown of -46.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and ENB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMENBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-46.35%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-9.10%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-15.78%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-28.32%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.34%

-44.07%

-17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.97%

-2.98%

-8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-10.83%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

3.63%

+1.94%

Volatility

XOM vs. ENB - Volatility Comparison

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB) at 5.79%. This indicates that XOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMENBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

5.79%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.28%

12.87%

+7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.48%

16.13%

+8.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.73%

18.63%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.18%

24.33%

+3.85%

Dividends

XOM vs. ENB - Dividend Comparison

XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than ENB's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENB
Enbridge Inc.
4.93%5.66%6.28%7.31%6.80%6.85%7.55%5.58%6.68%4.71%4.13%4.71%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.72%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Financials

XOM vs. ENB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
83.16B
22.36B
(XOM) Total Revenue
(ENB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XOM vs. ENB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Enbridge Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
0
Portfolio components
XOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

ENB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 22.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

XOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

ENB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

XOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

ENB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XOM and ENB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to ENB (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs ENB's -46.35%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOM and ENB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer