XOM vs. CEG
XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) and CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) are both stocks. XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy), while CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, XOM returned 15.15%/yr vs 40.06%/yr for CEG. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XOM vs. CEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOM achieves a 23.81% return, which is significantly higher than CEG's -27.96% return.
XOM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- 1Y
- 38.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
CEG
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 6M
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -15.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOM vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 23.81% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 41.87% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -27.96% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOM and CEG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between XOM and CEG shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
XOM:
$614.94B
CEG:
$89.83B
XOM:
$5.93
CEG:
$8.13
XOM:
24.80
CEG:
31.23
XOM:
1.15
CEG:
0.54
XOM:
1.93
CEG:
3.31
XOM:
2.42
CEG:
2.68
XOM:
$326.01B
CEG:
$24.82B
XOM:
$83.11B
CEG:
$20.98B
XOM:
$60.44B
CEG:
$5.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOM vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank
XOM
CEG
XOM vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOM | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.38 | +2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | -0.78 | +7.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOM vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOM drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOM and CEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOM | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -50.70% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | -39.77% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -50.70% | +31.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | -36.93% | +23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -11.67% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 19.38% | -13.54% |
Volatility
XOM vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is 9.08%, while Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that XOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOM | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 15.26% | -6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.51% | 37.72% | -17.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 46.66% | -22.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 49.38% | -22.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 49.38% | -21.18% |
Dividends
XOM vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison
XOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than CEG's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.64% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.78% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
XOM vs. CEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exxon Mobil Corporation and Constellation Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
XOM vs. CEG - Profitability Comparison
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
XOM and CEG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to XOM (9.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOM dropped -62.40% vs CEG's -50.70%.
XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOM and CEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer