PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEX vs. USNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEX vs. USNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than USNZ's 11.68% return.


XOEX

1D
0.32%
1M
5.72%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.56%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
10Y*

USNZ

1D
0.03%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.70%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEX vs. USNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
10.27%18.97%12.07%15.99%2.98%
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
11.68%17.76%21.96%27.76%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEX and USNZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.80

The correlation between XOEX and USNZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOEX vs. USNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOEX
USNZ

Technology

26.7%
41.9%

Healthcare

16.7%
11.2%

Financial Services

15.5%
10.5%

Industrials

14.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
3.4%

Communication Services

5.1%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
10.5%

Energy

3.4%
0.0%

Utilities

2.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.3%

Technology

XOEX
26.7%
USNZ
41.9%

Healthcare

XOEX
16.7%
USNZ
11.2%

Financial Services

XOEX
15.5%
USNZ
10.5%

Industrials

XOEX
14.6%
USNZ
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

XOEX
7.7%
USNZ
3.4%

Communication Services

XOEX
5.1%
USNZ
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XOEX
4.8%
USNZ
10.5%

Energy

XOEX
3.4%
USNZ
0.0%

Utilities

XOEX
2.6%
USNZ
1.1%

Basic Materials

XOEX
1.7%
USNZ
1.3%

Real Estate

XOEX
1.1%
USNZ
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEX vs. USNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEX
XOEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

USNZ
USNZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
USNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEX vs. USNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOEXUSNZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.38

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.90

3.27

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.82

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.33

12.45

+3.89

XOEX vs. USNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the USNZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEX and USNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEXUSNZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.38

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Drawdowns

XOEX vs. USNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum USNZ drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and USNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEXUSNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-19.16%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-11.07%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-19.16%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-3.32%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.51%

-0.68%

Volatility

XOEX vs. USNZ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEXUSNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.33%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

10.12%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

13.00%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

16.63%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

16.63%

-3.21%

XOEX vs. USNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USNZ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEX vs. USNZ - Dividend Comparison

XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than USNZ's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
USNZ
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.14%1.19%0.80%
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
1.59%1.95%2.09%1.72%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEX and USNZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOEX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to USNZ (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs USNZ's -19.16%.

On 3-year performance, USNZ leads with 21.52% vs 18.54% for XOEX. On fees, USNZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USNZ has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 18.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USNZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XOEX.

XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.93% for USNZ.

XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while USNZ tracks Solactive ISS ESG United States Net Zero Pathway Enhanced Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.10% for USNZ.

XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEX and USNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer