PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEX vs. USCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEX vs. USCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than USCA's 7.05% return.


XOEX

1D
-0.53%
1M
6.34%
YTD
9.69%
6M
10.33%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10Y*

USCA

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.36%
YTD
7.05%
6M
7.01%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEX vs. USCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
9.69%18.97%12.07%15.57%
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
7.05%14.24%27.24%19.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEX and USCA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.78

The correlation between XOEX and USCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

XOEX vs. USCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOEX
USCA

Technology

26.7%
29.4%

Healthcare

16.7%
10.7%

Financial Services

15.5%
13.6%

Industrials

14.6%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

5.1%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
11.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.5%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
2.3%

Technology

XOEX
26.7%
USCA
29.4%

Healthcare

XOEX
16.7%
USCA
10.7%

Financial Services

XOEX
15.5%
USCA
13.6%

Industrials

XOEX
14.6%
USCA
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

XOEX
7.7%
USCA
4.7%

Communication Services

XOEX
5.1%
USCA
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XOEX
4.8%
USCA
11.9%

Energy

XOEX
3.4%
USCA
3.5%

Utilities

XOEX
2.6%
USCA
2.4%

Basic Materials

XOEX
1.7%
USCA
1.9%

Real Estate

XOEX
1.1%
USCA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEX vs. USCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEX
XOEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEX vs. USCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOEXUSCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

1.74

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

2.42

+1.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

2.05

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.43

8.13

+7.30

XOEX vs. USCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the USCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEX and USCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEXUSCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.74

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

1.49

-0.21

Drawdowns

XOEX vs. USCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum USCA drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and USCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEXUSCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.68%

-19.14%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-10.25%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-19.14%

+4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.81%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

-2.16%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.58%

-0.75%

Volatility

XOEX vs. USCA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) at 2.85%. This indicates that XOEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEXUSCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

2.85%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.30%

9.08%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

12.08%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

14.76%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

14.76%

-1.34%

XOEX vs. USCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USCA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XOEX vs. USCA - Dividend Comparison

XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than USCA's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.08%1.14%1.22%1.15%0.00%
XOEX
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
1.60%1.95%2.09%1.72%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEX and USCA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOEX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to USCA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs USCA's -19.14%.

On 3-year performance, USCA leads with 20.69% vs 18.33% for XOEX. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, USCA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USCA has performed better with a 20.69% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XOEX.

XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.08% for USCA.

XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.07% for USCA.

XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEX and USCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer