XOEX vs. MTUM
XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XOEX returned 18.54%/yr vs 34.75%/yr for MTUM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
XOEX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
XOEX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
XOEX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 10.27% | 18.97% | 12.07% | 15.99% | 2.98% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEX and MTUM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XOEX and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
XOEX vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOEX
MTUM
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
XOEX
MTUM
Healthcare
XOEX
MTUM
Financial Services
XOEX
MTUM
Industrials
XOEX
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
XOEX
MTUM
Communication Services
XOEX
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
XOEX
MTUM
Energy
XOEX
MTUM
Utilities
XOEX
MTUM
Basic Materials
XOEX
MTUM
Real Estate
XOEX
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
XOEX
MTUM
XOEX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOEX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 2.20 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 2.98 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 3.64 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | 14.50 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.20 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 0.85 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
XOEX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -34.08% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -11.54% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -20.99% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -6.21% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.89% | -1.06% |
Volatility
XOEX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) is 3.39%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that XOEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEX | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 7.68% | -4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 16.46% | -8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 19.04% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 20.60% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 21.03% | -7.61% |
XOEX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XOEX and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XOEX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.59% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to XOEX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEX dropped -14.68% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 34.75% vs 18.54% for XOEX. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, XOEX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 34.75% return vs 18.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOEX and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. XOEX tracks S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
XOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEX and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer