XOEX vs. BUFH
XOEX (Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Ex-Top 20 Select Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
XOEX vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
XOEX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOEX vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 9.69% | 14.30% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEX and BUFH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEX vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
XOEX
BUFH
XOEX vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF (XOEX) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOEX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.70 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOEX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 2.91 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
XOEX vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEX drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEX and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -1.53% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.05% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -0.18% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | — | — |
Volatility
XOEX vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEX | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 2.37% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 2.37% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.42% | 2.37% | +11.05% |
XOEX vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEX vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
XOEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOEX Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.09% | 1.72% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEX and BUFH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOEX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOEX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
XOEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
XOEX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XOEX and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for XOEX and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer