XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XNZN.L (Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C) and MIVO.L (Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - XNZN.L tracks the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR while MIVO.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. XNZN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for MIVO.L.

Performance

XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XNZN.L is traded in EUR, while MIVO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIVO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XNZN.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MIVO.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.10%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 6.26%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 3.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIVO.L

MIVO.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
MIVO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MIVO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MIVO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MIVO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MIVO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.L) and Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XNZN.L	MIVO.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.38	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XNZN.L	MIVO.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-38.17%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.99%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-12.94%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XNZN.L	MIVO.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	8.84%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	11.12%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	14.31%	—

XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MIVO.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XNZN.L vs. MIVO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZN.L nor MIVO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XNZN.L or MIVO.L?

On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNZN.L or MIVO.L?

MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XNZN.L.

What is the main difference between XNZN.L and MIVO.L?

XNZN.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZN.L and 0.13% for MIVO.L.