PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XNZN.L is traded in EUR, while EEIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EEIP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


XNZN.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEIP.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
13.55%
6M
16.34%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
17.05%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNZN.L

EEIP.L
EEIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EEIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNZN.LEEIP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

Drawdowns

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNZN.LEEIP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

Volatility

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNZN.LEEIP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNZN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEIP.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNZN.L nor EEIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XNZN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNZN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EEIP.L.

XNZN.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while EEIP.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZN.L and 0.29% for EEIP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNZN.L and EEIP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer