XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L
XNZN.L (Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C) and EEIP.L (WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - XNZN.L tracks the MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR while EEIP.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. Both are passively managed. XNZN.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EEIP.L.
Performance
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNZN.L is traded in EUR, while EEIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EEIP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XNZN.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEIP.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XNZN.L
EEIP.L
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nordic Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned UCITS ETF 1C (XNZN.L) and WisdomTree Europe Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (EEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNZN.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.47 | — |
Drawdowns
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNZN.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -40.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.81% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNZN.L | EEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.08% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.12% | — |
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNZN.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EEIP.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNZN.L vs. EEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNZN.L nor EEIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XNZN.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNZN.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EEIP.L.
XNZN.L tracks MSCI Nordic Countries NR EUR, while EEIP.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XNZN.L and 0.29% for EEIP.L.
Find the right allocation for XNZN.L and EEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer