XNTK vs. XLV
XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 23.90%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for XLV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XNTK vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 22.95% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 23.90%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.92% annualized return.
XNTK
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- 6M
- 20.03%
- YTD
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 32.81%
- 5Y*
- 17.83%
- 10Y*
- 23.90%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
XNTK vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 22.95% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.95% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and XLV is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XNTK and XLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XNTK vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
XLV
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XNTK
XLV
-
Communication Services
XNTK
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Energy
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
XNTK
-
XLV
Industrials
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Utilities
XNTK
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
XLV
XNTK vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNTK | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.25 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.60 | 5.33 | +2.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -39.17% | -33.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -10.47% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -17.11% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -17.11% | -31.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -28.40% | -19.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -2.04% | -10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.22% | -7.10% | -14.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.54% | 4.42% | +1.12% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 12.23% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 6.44%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.23% | 6.44% | +5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.00% | 11.87% | +12.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 15.85% | +12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.81% | 14.99% | +13.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 16.63% | +10.42% |
XNTK vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than XLV's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.57% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.16% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and XLV have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to XLV (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 23.90% vs 9.92% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.
XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer