XNTK vs. XLK
XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from State Street - XNTK tracks the NYSE Technology Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 24.56%/yr vs 24.50%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
XNTK vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 26.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XNTK having a 24.56% annualized return and XLK not far behind at 24.50%.
XNTK
- 1D
- -2.95%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 24.19%
- YTD
- 28.94%
- 1Y
- 51.65%
- 3Y*
- 35.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.39%
- 10Y*
- 24.56%
XLK
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 23.80%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 42.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.72%
- 10Y*
- 24.50%
XNTK vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 28.94% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 26.22% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and XLK is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XNTK and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
XNTK vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
XLK
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XNTK
XLK
Communication Services
XNTK
XLK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
XLK
-
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Energy
XNTK
-
XLK
Financial Services
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Industrials
XNTK
-
XLK
Real Estate
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Utilities
XNTK
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
XLK
XNTK vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNTK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.68 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 8.10 | +1.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -82.05% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -15.92% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -25.66% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -33.56% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -33.56% | -14.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -8.43% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.23% | -34.85% | +13.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 5.25% | +0.14% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 11.01%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.87% | 11.01% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.76% | 20.77% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.05% | 24.43% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.78% | 25.56% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 24.79% | +2.24% |
XNTK vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XLK's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.15% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XNTK and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XNTK has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to XLK (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.56% vs 24.50% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 11.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 24.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.
XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for XLK.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer