PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 24.56%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
-2.95%
1M
-2.95%
6M
24.19%
YTD
28.94%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
24.56%

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
28.94%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and UUP is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.28

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

6.26

+3.36

XNTK vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-22.19%

-50.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-3.65%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-10.05%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-10.37%

-37.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-14.24%

-34.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.36%

-1.26%

-7.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.23%

-8.88%

-12.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

1.33%

+4.06%

Volatility

XNTK vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.87%

1.45%

+12.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.76%

4.34%

+19.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.05%

6.03%

+22.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.78%

7.22%

+21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.03%

6.90%

+20.13%

XNTK vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.15%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and UUP have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.56% vs 3.17% for UUP. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while UUP is Currency. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.75% for UUP.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer