XNTK vs. TRUT
XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XNTK is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
XNTK vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 23.56% return.
XNTK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 18.67%
- YTD
- 37.92%
- 6M
- 36.17%
- 1Y
- 73.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.75%
- 5Y*
- 21.11%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 13.28%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNTK vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 37.92% | 17.45% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 23.56% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and TRUT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
TRUT
XNTK vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNTK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNTK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.25 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -18.55% | -53.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -2.83% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -5.16% | -16.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | — | — |
Volatility
XNTK vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 21.54% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 21.54% | +6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 21.54% | +5.09% |
XNTK vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and TRUT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer