PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XNTK having a 21.38% return and SPMO slightly lower at 21.07%. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 23.46%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 19.57% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
23.46%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M
$14.59M$14.88M$19.50M

XNTK vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
21.38%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and SPMO is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.73

The correlation between XNTK and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
SPMO

Technology

85.8%
53.7%

Communication Services

7.2%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.2%

Energy

-

3.3%

Financial Services

-

6.0%

Healthcare

-

6.9%

Industrials

-

11.2%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Technology

XNTK
85.8%
SPMO
53.7%

Communication Services

XNTK
7.2%
SPMO
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
7.0%
SPMO
1.2%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

SPMO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

SPMO
4.2%

Energy

XNTK

-

SPMO
3.3%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

SPMO
6.0%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

SPMO
6.9%

Industrials

XNTK

-

SPMO
11.2%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

SPMO
1.1%

Utilities

XNTK

-

SPMO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNTK vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

1.63

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

5.93

+1.02

XNTK vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-30.95%

-41.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.65%

-15.64%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-20.13%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-22.74%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-30.95%

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.74%

-11.03%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.21%

-4.62%

-16.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

4.29%

+1.86%

Volatility

XNTK vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 11.16% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.53%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

10.53%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.16%

21.52%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

23.90%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

20.60%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

20.92%

+6.25%

XNTK vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SPMO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and SPMO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (11.16%) compared to SPMO (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 23.46% vs 19.57% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 23.46% return vs 19.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.13% for SPMO.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer