PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 28.45% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 25.57%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.77% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
-1.00%
1M
18.67%
YTD
37.92%
6M
36.17%
1Y
73.92%
3Y*
42.75%
5Y*
21.11%
10Y*
25.57%

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
37.92%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and SPMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.72

The correlation between XNTK and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
SPMO

Technology

80.9%
52.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Technology

XNTK
80.9%
SPMO
52.6%

Communication Services

XNTK
9.8%
SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
9.3%
SPMO
1.3%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

SPMO
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

SPMO
4.3%

Energy

XNTK

-

SPMO
3.4%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

SPMO
6.7%

Industrials

XNTK

-

SPMO
11.3%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

SPMO
1.0%

Utilities

XNTK

-

SPMO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XNTKSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.47

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

13.52

+1.03

XNTK vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XNTKSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.49

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.25

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.03

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.00

-0.56

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-30.95%

-41.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-12.70%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-20.13%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-22.74%

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-30.95%

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.46%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-4.60%

-16.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

3.26%

+1.83%

Volatility

XNTK vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 7.65% and 7.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

7.39%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

14.49%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

17.70%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.90%

19.30%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.63%

20.31%

+6.32%

XNTK vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.17%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and SPMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to SPMO (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.57% vs 20.77% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 20.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.13% for SPMO.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer