PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. KNCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 40.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed KNCT with an annualized return of 23.46%, while KNCT has yielded a comparatively lower 18.83% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
0.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.38%
1Y
45.94%
3Y*
31.93%
5Y*
16.77%
10Y*
23.46%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

KNCT

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.96%
6M
31.73%
YTD
40.12%
1Y
63.92%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
13.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$741.37K$822.66K$837.91K
$14.59M$14.88M$19.50M

XNTK vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
21.38%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
40.12%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and KNCT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.82

The correlation between XNTK and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNTK vs. KNCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
KNCT

Technology

85.8%
86.3%

Communication Services

7.2%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.7%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
85.8%
KNCT
86.3%

Communication Services

XNTK
7.2%
KNCT
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
7.0%
KNCT

-

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

KNCT

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

KNCT

-

Energy

XNTK

-

KNCT

-

Financial Services

XNTK

-

KNCT
0.2%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

KNCT

-

Industrials

XNTK

-

KNCT
0.7%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

KNCT
3.0%

Utilities

XNTK

-

KNCT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNTK vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKKNCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.31

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

13.33

-6.38

XNTK vs. KNCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the KNCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and KNCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than KNCT's maximum drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and KNCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKKNCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-57.18%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.65%

-18.91%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-21.40%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-34.55%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-34.55%

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.74%

-14.80%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.21%

-10.73%

-10.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

4.68%

+1.47%

Volatility

XNTK vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) have volatilities of 11.16% and 11.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKKNCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

11.26%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.16%

24.68%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

27.67%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

24.48%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.17%

23.55%

+3.62%

XNTK vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than KNCT's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.68%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XNTK and KNCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KNCT has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to XNTK (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs KNCT's -57.18%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 23.46% vs 18.83% for KNCT. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XNTK has been the lower-risk option at 11.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 23.46% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.16% for XNTK.

XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and KNCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer