XNTK vs. IBIT
XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XNTK returned 65.70% vs -39.67% for IBIT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
XNTK vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 32.86% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.
XNTK
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- YTD
- 32.86%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 65.70%
- 3Y*
- 39.05%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 25.25%
IBIT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -19.59%
- YTD
- -27.41%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -39.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNTK vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 32.86% | 38.06% | 24.57% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.41% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and IBIT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between XNTK and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
IBIT
XNTK vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNTK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.85 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | -0.78 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.16 | -1.37 | +13.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -52.11% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -52.11% | +35.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.70% | -49.45% | +44.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -16.53% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 29.64% | -24.43% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) have volatilities of 12.53% and 12.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | 12.07% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | 34.45% | -13.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.43% | 44.10% | -18.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 50.26% | -22.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 50.26% | -23.44% |
XNTK vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and IBIT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to IBIT (12.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, XNTK leads with 65.70% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 12.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 65.70% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.25% for IBIT.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer