PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 28.94% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's 23.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XNTK having a 24.56% annualized return and FTEC not far behind at 24.46%.


XNTK

1D
-2.95%
1M
-2.95%
6M
24.19%
YTD
28.94%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
35.76%
5Y*
18.39%
10Y*
24.56%

FTEC

1D
-2.12%
1M
-0.92%
6M
21.21%
YTD
23.14%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
18.71%
10Y*
24.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
28.94%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.14%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and FTEC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.93

The correlation between XNTK and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNTK vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
FTEC

Technology

83.3%
98.6%

Communication Services

8.6%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XNTK
83.3%
FTEC
98.6%

Communication Services

XNTK
8.6%
FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
8.0%
FTEC
0.0%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

FTEC

-

Energy

XNTK

-

FTEC
0.3%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

FTEC
0.4%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

FTEC

-

Industrials

XNTK

-

FTEC
0.5%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

FTEC

-

Utilities

XNTK

-

FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.41

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

7.04

+2.58

XNTK vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-34.95%

-37.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-16.26%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-27.30%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-34.95%

-13.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-34.95%

-13.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.36%

-8.03%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.23%

-5.57%

-15.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

5.56%

-0.17%

Volatility

XNTK vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 9.63%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.87%

9.63%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.76%

19.41%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.05%

23.43%

+4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.78%

25.73%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.03%

24.90%

+2.13%

XNTK vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.15%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XNTK and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XNTK has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to FTEC (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.56% vs 24.46% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 9.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 24.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.

XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.08% for FTEC.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer