XNOV vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XNOV (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNOV is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XNOV returned 13.00% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. XNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

XNOV vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNOV achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

XNOV

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 6M: 4.21%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNOV vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November	4.30%	11.32%	8.26%	2.26%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XNOV and BAMU is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	-0.00

The correlation between XNOV and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XNOV vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNOV

XNOV Risk / Return Rank: 89
XNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNOV vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNOV	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	5.01	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.58	8.84	-4.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	2.43	-0.71
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	24.72	-21.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.01	97.90	-76.88

XNOV vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNOV Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNOV and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNOV vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNOV drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNOV and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNOV	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-0.36%	-9.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.60%	-0.12%	-3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	0.00%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-0.02%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.62%	0.03%	+0.59%

Volatility

XNOV vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November (XNOV) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that XNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNOV	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.00%	0.09%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.89%	0.40%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33%	0.58%	+3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	0.87%	+6.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	0.87%	+6.02%

XNOV vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNOV vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

XNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
XNOV FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNOV and BAMU in my portfolio?

XNOV and BAMU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XNOV or BAMU?

XNOV has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNOV dropped -10.00% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, XNOV or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, XNOV leads with 13.00% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, XNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNOV or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, XNOV has performed better with a 13.00% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNOV or BAMU?

XNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNOV or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.00% for XNOV.

What is the main difference between XNOV and BAMU?

XNOV is categorized as Options Trading, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XNOV and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.