XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE
XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) and UIM5.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) are both Japan Equities funds - XNKY.DE tracks the Nikkei 225® while UIM5.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNKY.DE returned 12.47%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for UIM5.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNKY.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for UIM5.DE.
Performance
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 30.76% return, which is significantly higher than UIM5.DE's 14.71% return.
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- YTD
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 56.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
UIM5.DE
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 30.76% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 7.65% |
UIM5.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 14.71% | 12.70% | 13.65% | 16.46% | -12.42% | 10.03% | 6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNKY.DE and UIM5.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XNKY.DE and UIM5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNKY.DE
UIM5.DE
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UIM5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNKY.DE | UIM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 3.16 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 10.02 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum UIM5.DE drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and UIM5.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNKY.DE | UIM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -99.65% | +78.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -10.09% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -16.89% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -19.01% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -98.25% | +88.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -94.91% | +87.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 3.19% | +1.37% |
Volatility
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UIM5.DE) at 6.62%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIM5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNKY.DE | UIM5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 6.62% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | 16.42% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.87% | 19.97% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 16.90% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 16.50% | +2.29% |
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than UIM5.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XNKY.DE vs. UIM5.DE - Dividend Comparison
XNKY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIM5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UIM5.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.61% | 1.71% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 1.54% | 1.20% |
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNKY.DE and UIM5.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for UIM5.DE.
XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while UIM5.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.12% for UIM5.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and UIM5.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer