XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE
XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) and TTPX.DE (Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds - XNKY.DE tracks the Nikkei 225® while TTPX.DE tracks the TOPIX Index (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNKY.DE returned 12.47%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for TTPX.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNKY.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for TTPX.DE.
Performance
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 30.76% return, which is significantly higher than TTPX.DE's 16.32% return.
XNKY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- YTD
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 56.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.47%
- 10Y*
- —
TTPX.DE
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 24.66%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF | 30.76% | 16.16% | 14.34% | 18.03% | -15.35% | 3.16% | 7.65% |
TTPX.DE Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) | 16.32% | 27.49% | 21.75% | 32.48% | -4.73% | 10.61% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNKY.DE and TTPX.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XNKY.DE and TTPX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XNKY.DE
TTPX.DE
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNKY.DE | TTPX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.39 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 4.26 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 14.65 | -2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum TTPX.DE drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and TTPX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNKY.DE | TTPX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -36.52% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -9.80% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -20.65% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.15% | -20.65% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -4.33% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -7.80% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.56% | 2.86% | +1.70% |
Volatility
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) at 6.03%. This indicates that XNKY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTPX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNKY.DE | TTPX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 6.03% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.87% | 15.54% | +5.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.87% | 19.47% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 18.09% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 18.15% | +0.64% |
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TTPX.DE's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNKY.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XNKY.DE nor TTPX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XNKY.DE and TTPX.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for TTPX.DE.
XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while TTPX.DE tracks TOPIX Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.48% for TTPX.DE.
Find the right allocation for XNKY.DE and TTPX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer