XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XNKY.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF) and PAEEM.PA (Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XNKY.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Nikkei 225®, while PAEEM.PA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ex-Egypt ESG Broad CTB Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XNKY.DE returned 13.33%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for PAEEM.PA. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNKY.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for PAEEM.PA.

Performance

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNKY.DE achieves a 38.55% return, which is significantly higher than PAEEM.PA's 28.74% return.

XNKY.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 38.55%
• 6M: 39.35%
• 1Y: 66.87%
• 3Y*: 23.92%
• 5Y*: 13.33%
• 10Y*: —

PAEEM.PA

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 6M: 29.92%
• 1Y: 48.05%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: 8.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XNKY.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF	38.55%	16.16%	14.34%	18.03%	-15.35%	3.16%	7.65%
PAEEM.PA Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc	28.74%	22.47%	13.04%	3.26%	-15.31%	4.42%	6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020	0.54

The correlation between XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNKY.DE

XNKY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XNKY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
XNKY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XNKY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XNKY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

PAEEM.PA

PAEEM.PA Risk / Return Rank: 85
PAEEM.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PAEEM.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PAEEM.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PAEEM.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PAEEM.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNKY.DE	PAEEM.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	2.47	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.24	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.17	4.43	+0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.47	15.28	+0.19

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNKY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the PAEEM.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNKY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum PAEEM.PA drawdown of -31.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNKY.DE	PAEEM.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.47%	-31.94%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-10.70%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.16%	-18.68%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.15%	-23.63%	+2.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.10%	-3.98%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-10.65%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	3.12%	+1.21%

Volatility

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (XNKY.DE) and Amundi PEA Emergent (MSCI Emerging) ESG Transition UCITS ETF Acc (PAEEM.PA) have volatilities of 9.07% and 8.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNKY.DE	PAEEM.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.07%	8.90%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.16%	16.84%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.08%	19.18%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.33%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	19.39%	-0.73%

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNKY.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PAEEM.PA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNKY.DE vs. PAEEM.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither XNKY.DE nor PAEEM.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA in my portfolio?

XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XNKY.DE or PAEEM.PA?

On fees, XNKY.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNKY.DE or PAEEM.PA?

XNKY.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PAEEM.PA.

What is the main difference between XNKY.DE and PAEEM.PA?

XNKY.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while PAEEM.PA is Emerging Markets Equities. XNKY.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while PAEEM.PA tracks MSCI EM ex-Egypt ESG Broad CTB Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XNKY.DE and 0.30% for PAEEM.PA.